In this special edition of the St Emlyn’s podcast, Iain Beardsell and Simon Carley review the top medical papers of 2024, originating from Simon’s talk at The Big Sick conference in Zermatt. The discussion includes a comparison of non-invasive versus arterial pressure monitoring, the association of intra-arrest arterial blood pressure with ROSC, the efficacy of serratus anterior plane blocks for rib fracture management, and the evaluation of a micro axial flow pump in cardiogenic shock.

They also delve into double sequential external defibrillation in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and provide a rapid-fire review of additional critical papers discussed at the conference. Notable mentions include the HEMOTION trial, PRE OXI trial, BLING III, and PARAMEDIC-3, among others.

A must-listen for those passionate about evidence-based medicine in emergency and pre-hospital care.

You can read more about all the trials, including links to all the papers here (part 1) and here (part 2)

00:00 Introduction and Conference Highlights

01:51 Non-Invasive vs. Arterial Pressure Monitoring

03:28 Intra-Arrest Blood Pressure and ROSC

05:34 Serratus Anterior Plane Blocks for Rib Fractures

08:38 Micro Axial Flow Pump in Cardiogenic Shock 10:49 Double Sequential Defibrillation in Cardiac Arrest

13:17 HEMOTION Trial

15:01 PRE OXI and BLING III Trials

17:08 Fluid Management in Septic Shock

18:37 Expedited Transfer vs. On-Scene Resuscitation

20:39 Intraosseous vs. Intravenous Access

21:48 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

In this episode, hosts Iain Beardsell and Simon Carley provide the St Emlyn's podcast blog update for July 2024. They discuss their recent experiences, including Simon's trip to Malaysia for the MRCEM exams and Iain's upcoming attendance at the Tactical Trauma conference in Sweden.

The main topics include a systematic review on the Manchester Acute Coronary Score (MACS) and its application in emergency departments, the potential influence of AI in diagnosing occlusive myocardial infarctions through ECGs, and guidelines for managing non-fatal strangulation cases. Additionally, they touch on the feasibility of using lidocaine patches for elderly patients with rib fractures and the role of partial REBOA in pre-hospital care for exsanguinating subdiaphragmatic haemorrhage.

They also highlight informative segments from the premier conference on pediatric emergency medicine, covering topics such as eating disorders, hybrid closed-loop insulin pumps, and button battery ingestion. Finally, they emphasize the importance of understanding medical statistics and using diagnostic tests effectively in emergency medicine practice.

00:00 Introduction and Summer Updates

00:55 Upcoming Conferences and Events

01:44 Manchester Acute Coronary Score (MACS) Review

05:30 AI in ECG Analysis with Steve Smith

08:18 Non-Fatal Strangulation Awareness

10:45 Reboa: Pre-Hospital Use and Insights

14:11 Pediatric Emergency Medicine Highlights

14:36 Eating Disorders and Diabetes Management

19:00 Lidocaine Patches for Rib Fractures

21:46 Critical Appraisal and Medical Statistics

24:28 Button Battery Ingestion Dangers

26:12 Conclusion and Farewell

As the UK enjoys its unpredictable summer, with everything from sunshine to hailstorms, we bring you a mix of updates and discussions on emergency medicine, blog content, upcoming conferences, and insightful research reviews. So, whether you're basking in the sun or sheltering from the rain, sit back and enjoy our latest insights into the world of emergency medicine.

In this round-up of Month Year, we talk about a wide range of issues relating to emergency medicine, including nebulised ketamine for analgesia in the ED, risky intubations, presentation skills, more about the DOSE VF trial and analysis of the much-hyped PREOXI trial about preoxygenation before tracheal intubation.

We're excited to announce our participation in two upcoming conferences. The Tactical Trauma Conference in Sweden this October promises to delve into pre-hospital emergency medicine, offering sessions from renowned speakers. It's a fantastic opportunity to learn and network, with flights to Sweden being relatively affordable. The event takes place just north of Stockholm, providing a chance to explore the beautiful city.

In March next year, we look forward to the Incrementum Conference in Murcia, Spain. This is a significant event as emergency medicine has recently been recognized as a specialty in Spain. The conference will feature an impressive lineup of speakers from the FOMED world, including Scott Weingart, Ken Milne, Hany Malamatt, and Slim Resie , among others. Our very own Simon Carly will also be presenting. We'll be there to conduct interviews and gather exclusive content for our listeners.

Thank you for joining us, please do like and subscribe wherever you get our podcasts.

Welcome to the St Emlyn's Monthly Podcast, your go-to source for the latest insights, developments, and discussions in emergency medicine and critical care. Each month, Simon and Iain will bring you in-depth analysis, evidence-based practices, and practical advice to enhance your clinical practice and professional development. 

In this round-up of May 2024, we talk about a wide range of issues relating to emergency medicine, including highlights from the RCEM conference, including the future management of head injury, crowding, RATing and what it takes to be an awesome ED for training. There's also advice on how to be a epic Emergency Physician In Charge, as well as discussion about the use of ChatGPT for medical exams, serratus anterior blocks for rib fractures, whether first pass success matters and the return of measles.

Thank you for joining us, please do like and subscribe wherever you get our podcasts.

An EBM-packed episode where Iain and Simon go over ten of the top papers from the last year discussing all manners of things Emergency Medicine, including TXA in trauma, use of video laryngoscopy, defibrillation strategies in refractory VF, and ten-second triage in major incidents. There's also a very pertinent discussion about whether the age of your Emergency Physician might affect your outcome...

Thank you again for listening to the St Emlyn's podcast. Please do like and subscribe and get in touch if there is anything you'd like us to discuss or if you'd like to get involved. 

After a long, hot and relaxing summer (!) Simon and Iain return with all the content from the St Emlyn's blog in July and August. They discuss four papers in detail, including the ARREST trial about cardiac arrest centres, whether clinical examination can identify life threatening injuries in trauma, the TOP-ART study looking at a novel agent in trauma management and the use of REBOA. 

Please do like and subscribe and get in touch if you would like to contribute to the blog site. 

This is the first in a series of podcasts, recorded live at the Premier Conference in Winchester.

In this episode, David James challenges our current practice when we give a 'weaning plan' for children discharged with wheeze. 

There is a plan here that you can review and give to patients and their carers.

More information at these excellent websites

• PIER Network
• Southampton Oxford Retrieval Team
• Healthier Together

David James has been a PEM Consultant at University Hospital Southampton since 2018. His main interests are in training and education, adolescent emergency medicine and Quality Improvement. He is the Divisional Director of Medical Education and a Training advisor on the PEMISAC. He is the acute care lead for Wessex Healthier Together and has led several projects including those around acute wheeze at UHS and regionally. Outside of work he enjoys swimming, cycling and running and is extremely average at triathlons.

The latest CAN is one of our brand-new 'revision editions' -- brief podcasts aimed at covering the essentials of critical appraisal for medical students and junior doctors preparing for exams.

With the help of Gregory Yates, an academic doctor based in Manchester, this episode introduces two core concepts: sensitivity and specificity. These are two ways of thinking about the accuracy of a diagnostic test. Knowing the sensitivity and specificity of an investigation will give you a decent idea of how it should be used in the emergency department.

Sensitivity (Sn) describes the chance that a test will be positive if your patient has the condition you're testing for. Some people call it the 'true positive rate' or alternatively the positivity in disease (PID) rate. If you need a hand remembering it, you can always remember that PID is a sensitive issue.

Meanwhile, specificity (Sp) considers the chance of a test being negative if the patient doesn't have the condition you're testing for. It's the 'true negative rate' or alternatively the negativity in health (NIH) rate. There are times when we particularly need a test to have a high sensitivity. This is generally when we want to be particularly confident that a test accurately identifies everyone with the relevant condition because we really don't want to miss it. We need a high sensitivity to rule out disease. (Sn-uff it out). At other times, we need to be confident that a patient with a positive test actually has the disease - for example, if the treatment is unpleasant or involves exposing patients to risk. In that case, we want a high specificity to rule in disease. (Sp-in it in).

In this CAN, we use D-Dimer as an example of a very sensitive investigation: it’s positive in nearly 100% of cases of venous thromboembolism. Specificity describes the likelihood that the test will be negative if your patient does not have the disease. We use HbA1c as an example of a highly specific investigation: it’s rarely used in the emergency department, but if it’s elevated, we can be almost certain that the patient is diabetic. HbA1c is almost never (<1%) raised in non-diabetics.

The trouble is, many patients with a positive D-Dimer do not have a venous clot, and the majority of diabetics will have a normal HbA1c! No test is perfect, and we discuss how emergency physicians weigh up sensitivity and specificity when choosing which investigations are the best "fit" for clinical decision-making. By the end of this CAN, you will be ready to do the same -- in your exams, and on the shop floor.

Our regular monthly round up and chat from the St Emlyn's blog. We talk about the use of artificial intelligence in research and the use of remifentanil instead of neuromuscular blockade in rapid sequence intubation. Plus more about the StEmlynsWILD conference and Simon's new role as Dean of RCEM and how you can get involved. 

Long term listeners to the St Emlyn’s podcast may remember our series entitled ‘Critical Appraisal Nuggets’ (CANs). We are absolutely delighted to reinvigorate this project under the leadership of Professor Rick Body, with the episode on semi structured interviews.

In this easily digestible and succinct podcast Rick and Laura Howard go through the pros and cons of setting up semi structured interviews and how these can be used effectively in qualitative research.

In the latest episode, we cover a qualitative research technique: semi-structured interviews. Qualitative research might be out of your comfort zone: we’re generally more comfortable with quantitative measures – numbers and statistics. It’s something they have experience with, having previously published a paper exploring the impact of events that happen at work on the wellbeing of emergency physicians. This was a labour of love for Laura. Laura wrote a powerful blog about it here.

Semi-structured interviews are a great way to get the really rich data we need to understand something in greater depth. They allow us to ask ‘why?’ as well as just ‘what?’, ‘who?’ and ‘when?’. But reading qualitative research papers can be difficult when it takes us out of our comfort zone. In this CAN podcast, Laura and Rick take us through what semi-structured interviews are, why we might use them, how you design and conduct them, and they also have some pearls of wisdom about how to make transcribing them a lot less painful. By the end, we hope that you’ll feel confident with the basics of the technique. And if you want to practice your critical appraisal, why not put their study under the microscope?

This is our round up of all that happened on the St Emlyn's blog in August 2022 (yes - we know it's a bit late, but there's been a lot going on!).

Listen to Simon and Iain discuss the latest therapies in COVID, particularly Baricitinib, calcium in trauma and how we find balance in our work-life blend.

Please do like and subscribe to the podcast and tell your friends and colleagues. We've lots of exciting stuff coming your way over the next few months.

Simon and Iain run through the latest highlights from the St Emlyn's blog and podcast, including the FORCE study, the EXIT study and more about Vitamin C in sepsis...

We hope you enjoy the podcast. Please do like and subscribe on your preferred podcast app and tell your friends and colleagues about us. 

Our monthly round up of all from the St Emlyn's blog. We discuss pathways into emergency care research, pad positioning in cardioversion of AF and possible gender differences in the presciption of TXA in trauma.

We also chat about travel in Lithuania, memories of defibrillating with hand held paddles and Simon's recent forst infection with COVID.

We mention a post on Lyme disease which you can read here (especially if you live near the New Forest...)

A podcast with Iain and Simon summarising all the latest content from the St Emlyn's blog in April 2021. Topics discussed include Vaccine Induced Thrombocytopenic Thrombosis, how our own biases can effect our critical appraisal and whether we need to worry about grading the quality of FOAMed resources.

Thanks for listening. Please check out the blogs themselevs at www.stemlynsblog.org and consider subscribing and rating us on iTunes. 

If you'd like to see some more from Peter Brindley you can watch one of his SMACC talks here. 

Welcome to our fifth webinar and journal club reviewing recent research and featuring COVID-19 updates, hosted by the University of Manchester, Manchester Royal Infirmary and Royal College of Emergency Medicine in collaboration with St Emlyn’s.

The live event took place on Tuesday 12th May at 11.00am BST (10.00am GMT). 

The COVID-19 Journal Club Panel

Today’s panel was hosted by Rick Body The panel includes Prof Paul Klapper (Professor of Clinical Virology), Dr Charlie Reynard (NIHR Clinical Research Fellow), Prof Dan Horner, Dr Anisa Jafar, Prof Pam Vallely (Professor of Medical Virology), Prof Simon Carley and special guest Lauren Westafer (Attending in Emergency Medicine and Co-Creator of the Foamcast blog and podcast) and Ellie Hothershall (head of undergraduate medicine at the University of Dundee and an expert in Public Health) to discuss six papers about COVID-19 infection.

Welcome to our fourth webinar and journal club reviewing recent research and featuring COVID-19 updates, hosted by the University of Manchester, Manchester Royal Infirmary and Royal College of Emergency Medicine in collaboration with St Emlyn's.

The live event tool place on Tuesday 5th May at 11.30am BST (10.30am GMT). 

The panel was again be hosted by Rick Body The panel includes Prof Paul Klapper (Professor of Clinical Virology), Dr Charlie Reynard (NIHR Clinical Research Fellow), Dr Anisa Jafar (Academic Clinical Lecturer), Prof Pam Vallely (Professor of Medical Virology), Prof Simon Carley and special guest Justin Morgenstern to discuss six papers about COVID-19 infection.

There will be another COVID 19 Journal Club next week (Tuesday 12th May at 11am).

References

Podcast edited from a live webinar by Izzy Carley 

It's been another busy month at St Emlyn's, with the publication of 15 blog posts and five podcasts, but there does seem to be an awful lot to talk about!

Of course there have been multiple posts and podcasts about COVID-19, and you can fiind all of these on our special St Emlyn's page. Highlights have included the three RCEM/St Emlyn's Webinars which we are delighted to host in podcast form.

It's not just been coronavirus though, we have also dipped out toes into exercise and nutrition, graphic design and horticulture!

Parts of the site have also undergone a bit of a redesign with the curriculum pages now easier to navigate to find that post to fioll an e-portfolio hole.

We hope you're finding all of our output useful. Please do subscribe to the website (in the top right hand corner) and rate our podcast on iTunes.

They'll be much more to come in May I am sure.

Take care

Iain

Podcast edited by Izzy Carley

In this podcast, Dan and Iain talk about the clinical journey of a COVID-19 patient, beyond the ED, with insights from the critical care unit. There are some concepts here that we don’t have time to do full justice to in the podcast, so there is a comprehensive set of "show notes" and all the references at www.stemlynsblog.org/covid-19-and-critical-care

Iain and Simon discuss Covid19 and more in this review of the best of the blog from March 2020.

Simon interviews Dr John Rogers and Dr Nathan Lewis on respiratory infection prevention.

John a Sports and Exercise Medicine Consultant in Manchester. He is also Chief Medical Officer for British Triathlon and Visiting Professor in Sport & Exercise Medicine at Manchester Metropolitan University.

Nathan is lead performance nutrition scientist at the English Institute of Sport and at ORRECO.

These two academics take us through how sports science might be able to support our wellbeing during the Covid19 pandemic.

References

Iain is back on the podcast with Simon to talk through the best of the blog from January 2020.

Prof. Rick Body is an internationally recognised expert in diagnostic testing. In this podcast he takes us through diagnostics today and also the near future which may change almost everything. 

You can read more and see the slides/video at http://www.stemlynsblog.com

This is Chris's talk from #stemlynsLIVE on GI emergencies. Remember to check out the blog for the background, references and more.

St. Emlyn's Podcast: Key Insights from May in Emergency Medicine

As we transition into the warmer months, it's an opportune time to reflect on recent discussions and developments within the field of emergency medicine, particularly those highlighted in the latest episode of the St. Emlyn's podcast. This episode covered a wide range of topics, from workplace safety to advancements in pediatric care and innovative approaches in patient management. Below is a comprehensive summary of the key points discussed.

Workplace Safety: A Pressing Concern

The podcast began with a reflection on a recent violent incident at Newham Emergency Department (ED), which served as a stark reminder of the dangers healthcare professionals face daily. Emergency departments, by their very nature, are open and accessible, making them vulnerable to violent incidents. This recent attack has prompted a nationwide reassessment of safety measures, with many EDs enhancing their protocols to protect staff.

The conversation emphasized that violence in the workplace should never be normalized. It’s crucial that healthcare professionals feel safe and supported in their working environment. Leadership within departments plays a critical role in this, not only by implementing robust safety protocols but also by fostering a culture of solidarity and mutual support among staff. The incident at Newham underscores the need for constant vigilance and proactive measures to ensure the safety of everyone working in emergency medicine.

Leadership in Education: Simon Carley’s New Role

In more positive news, Simon Carley’s recent appointment as the CPD (Continuing Professional Development) lead for the college was discussed. This role is a significant milestone, not just for Simon but also for the integration of modern educational approaches within formal medical education. Simon’s involvement with St. Emlyn's has long been focused on innovative, social media-driven education, and this new role offers an opportunity to bring these methods into a broader educational framework.

The appointment highlights the value of combining traditional education with the dynamic, accessible formats offered by the #FOAMed (Free Open Access Meducation) community. It’s a recognition that medical education can benefit from new perspectives and that the integration of these ideas can enhance the learning experiences for healthcare professionals.

Pediatric Status Epilepticus: Evaluating Second-Line Agents

The discussion moved to a detailed analysis of pediatric status epilepticus, focusing on the findings from two key trials: the Eclipse trial and the ConSEPT trial. These studies compared the efficacy of levetiracetam (Keppra) and phenytoin as second-line agents for stopping seizures in children.

The trials found no significant difference between the two drugs in terms of their effectiveness, which has led to debate within the medical community about whether to switch from phenytoin to levetiracetam. While levetiracetam is perceived as easier to administer and safer, the lack of a clear superiority has left the decision somewhat open. However, the ease of use and safety profile of levetiracetam make it an appealing option, and some institutions are considering making the switch.

For clinicians, the takeaway is that while both drugs are viable options, the choice may ultimately come down to individual preferences and institutional protocols. The trials underscore the importance of continuous evaluation of treatment options, particularly in complex cases like pediatric seizures.

Understanding Clinical Trials: The Importance of Statistical Literacy

Simon Carley also highlighted the importance of understanding the statistical nuances in clinical trials, particularly the difference between demonstrating a difference between treatments and establishing their equivalence. This distinction is crucial for accurately interpreting research findings and making informed clinical decisions.

The discussion emphasized that clinicians must be cautious in how they interpret trial results, particularly when it comes to determining whether treatments are genuinely equivalent or if the lack of a significant difference merely reflects the study’s design. This level of critical appraisal is essential for ensuring that new research is applied correctly in clinical practice.

Prolonged Field Care in the ED: Learning from Military Medicine

Another topic discussed was prolonged field care, a concept borrowed from military medicine that is becoming increasingly relevant in emergency departments due to overcrowding and delays. Rich Carden introduced the HITMAN mnemonic—Hygiene and Hydration, Infection, Tubes, Medication, Analgesia, and Nutrition—as a framework for managing patients who are stuck in the ED for extended periods.

The HITMAN approach ensures that patients' fundamental needs are met even when resources are stretched. This method helps prevent complications and improves patient outcomes, even in less-than-ideal conditions. The approach is particularly relevant in today’s healthcare environment, where EDs are often overwhelmed and patients may wait longer than usual for admission or transfer.

Atrial Fibrillation: Reassessing Cardioversion Strategies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) management was another key topic. A recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine compared immediate cardioversion with a wait-and-see approach in patients with new-onset AF. The study found that a wait-and-see approach was non-inferior to immediate cardioversion, with 69% of patients in the wait-and-see group spontaneously cardioverting within 48 hours.

This finding challenges the traditional approach of immediate cardioversion and suggests that in many cases, a more conservative approach may be just as effective. However, the decision should be made through shared decision-making with the patient, taking into account their preferences and the specific circumstances of their condition. This patient-centered approach ensures that treatment decisions are made collaboratively and with the patient’s best interests in mind.

Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Reevaluating Chest Compressions

The podcast also touched on the evolving management of traumatic cardiac arrest, particularly the role of chest compressions. Recent studies, including one involving porcine models, suggest that in cases of hypovolemic traumatic cardiac arrest, chest compressions may not be beneficial and could even be harmful. Instead, the focus should be on addressing the underlying cause, such as restoring circulating volume.

This shift in practice highlights the importance of understanding the specific etiology of cardiac arrest and tailoring resuscitation efforts accordingly. Communicating these changes to the entire resuscitation team is crucial, as there may be resistance to deviating from traditional protocols. Ensuring that everyone is on the same page and understands the rationale behind the approach is key to successful implementation.

Virtual Reality in Pain Management: An Emerging Tool

Virtual reality (VR) is emerging as a promising tool in pain management, particularly in pediatric patients undergoing painful procedures. A recent study discussed in the podcast found that children who used VR experienced less distress during procedures compared to those who received standard care.

VR offers an innovative, accessible method for managing pain and anxiety, and its use is likely to expand in the coming years. The ability to create immersive environments that distract patients during procedures has the potential to improve patient experiences and outcomes, not just in children but potentially in adults as well.

The Power of Peer Review: Enhancing Clinical Practice

Finally, Simon Carley discussed the importance of peer review in clinical practice. Peer review is a valuable tool for continuous improvement, allowing clinicians to receive feedback from colleagues on their performance. While it can be challenging to create a culture where feedback is welcomed and constructive, the benefits are significant.

Peer review helps clinicians avoid complacency, stay up-to-date with best practices, and continually refine their skills. It’s a simple, cost-effective way to ensure that healthcare professionals are delivering the highest standard of care. Creating a supportive environment where feedback is seen as an opportunity for growth rather than criticism is essential for the success of peer review initiatives.

Conclusion

The discussions in this month’s St. Emlyn's podcast highlight the complexities and challenges of working in emergency medicine, from ensuring workplace safety to staying current with evolving practices. By engaging with new research, embracing innovative tools like virtual reality, and fostering a culture of continuous improvement through peer review, we can continue to advance the field and improve patient care. As always, the St. Emlyn's blog and podcast remain valuable resources for staying informed and connected with the latest developments in emergency medicine.

Highlights from March 2019: Key Insights and Updates

Welcome to the St Emlyn's podcast. I'm Simon Carley and today; I'll be taking you through the highlights from our blog in March 2019. This was a busy month filled with exceptional content, insightful trips, and significant conferences. Let's dive into the details and explore some key topics, starting with adult congenital heart disease, top trauma papers, and the importance of responsible volunteering.

Management of Adult Congenital Heart Disease

March kicked off with an important post on the management of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). This topic is particularly close to my heart as the hospital I work at is a level two centre for ACHD in the UK. Services have become centralized, and surgical components are now managed at a few specialized centres, with Liverpool being the hub for my region.

Despite this centralization, we still encounter a large population of ACHD patients in our area. These patients often present complex medical histories and unique pathologies that can be challenging to manage in emergency settings. The guidance available typically focuses on chronic and surgical management, but emergency care for these patients requires a different approach.

Common Issues in ACHD Patients

ACHD patients commonly present with dysrhythmias, which can be particularly challenging to manage. Chest pain is also prevalent, although the incidence of ischemic heart disease isn’t significantly higher in ACHD patients, except for those who have undergone certain procedures like the switch operation. Other common issues include:

• Cyanotic patients: Those with single ventricle physiology and right-to-left shunts.
• Endocarditis: A rare but serious complication.
• Non-cardiac problems: Managing ACHD patients with conditions like appendicitis or pneumonia can be complex due to their unique circulatory dynamics.

The bottom line is that these patients often require specialized management strategies. When ACHD patients present with cardiac complications, we consult our local cardiologist or the ACHD centre. However, non-cardiac issues in ACHD patients also warrant discussion with the ACHD centre to ensure comprehensive care.

Key Takeaways for Emergency Physicians

Emergency physicians should familiarize themselves with the unique aspects of Fontan circulation, which relies on venous return based on venous pressure. Aggressive interventions like CPAP, bagging, and diuretics can be detrimental. Understanding these nuances is crucial for providing optimal care.

A Deeper Dive into Fontan Circulation

The Fontan procedure, a surgical intervention for single ventricle defects, creates a unique circulatory system that can be difficult to manage in emergency settings. Unlike normal circulation, Fontan physiology depends heavily on passive blood flow from the veins to the lungs. This means that increasing intrathoracic pressure through methods like CPAP or bagging can reduce cardiac output and worsen the patient's condition.

Fontan patients are particularly vulnerable to fluid shifts and pressures, making careful management of intravenous fluids and medications essential. Understanding these dynamics can be life-saving in the ED. For example, while diuretics might seem a reasonable choice for a patient with fluid overload, they can lead to dangerously low preload and cardiac output in a Fontan patient.

Top Trauma Papers from the Trauma UK Conference

Next up, we revisited some of the top trauma papers presented at the Trauma UK conference. These papers covered a range of topics, from the use of bougies in the ED to bag-mask ventilation during hypertensive resuscitation. Here are some key highlights:

The PAMPer Trial

The PAMPer trial examined the use of prehospital plasma in trauma patients and found significant survival benefits. This trial has important implications for trauma care protocols, emphasizing the potential of early plasma administration to improve outcomes.

The trial showed that administering plasma before hospital arrival can reduce mortality rates in severely injured patients. This finding supports the concept of damage control resuscitation, aiming to stabilize patients early and prevent coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia—the lethal triad in trauma.

Bougie Use in the ED

Another focal point was the utility of bougies in emergency airway management. Evidence suggests that bougies can significantly improve first-pass success rates in difficult intubations, making them a valuable tool in the ED.

A study highlighted at the conference demonstrated that the use of a bougie, even in routine intubations, could increase the success rates for first-pass intubations. This is particularly important in prehospital settings and emergency departments where difficult airways are common.

Late Presenting Head Injury Patients

A paper from Hull explored the management of patients presenting with head injuries more than 24 hours post-injury. The findings indicated that these patients have a significant incidence of important findings on CT scans, suggesting that delayed presentations should not be underestimated.

This study challenges the conventional exclusion of late-presenting head injury patients from acute imaging protocols. It suggests that significant injuries can still be present and warrant immediate attention, even if the patient presents days after the initial trauma.

The Zero Point Survey

The Zero Point Survey, which emphasizes situational awareness, team dynamics, and environmental control before initiating the primary survey, was also highlighted. This approach can significantly enhance resuscitation efforts, ensuring a more organized and effective response.

The Zero Point Survey encourages clinicians to prepare mentally and physically before patient contact. By assessing the situation, assembling the right team, and ensuring the environment is conducive to optimal care, clinicians can improve outcomes and reduce errors in high-stress scenarios.

Responsible Volunteering Overseas

One of the most thought-provoking posts of the month came from Stefan Brisions, discussing the need for responsible volunteering overseas. Volunteering in low and middle-income countries can be incredibly rewarding, but it’s essential to approach it with the right mindset and framework.

The Ethics of Volunteering

Stefan emphasized the importance of volunteering within a system that has sustainability and benefits for all parties involved. There have been concerns about individuals volunteering for personal gain rather than genuine altruism. It’s crucial to ensure that our efforts are focused on creating lasting, positive impacts.

Volunteering should always aim to build local capacity rather than create dependency. This means working with local healthcare providers to enhance their skills and infrastructure, ensuring that the benefits of volunteering continue long after volunteers have left.

Volunteering Responsibly

If you're considering volunteering abroad, it’s vital to engage with established organizations that have a clear mission and ethical framework. This ensures that your contributions are meaningful and aligned with the needs of the local community. Our discussions with experts like Shweta Gidwani, Hooling Harrison, Jennifer Hulls, and Najee Rahman offer valuable insights into this complex issue.

Case Study: Volunteering in South Africa

Kat Evans, who works in Mitchell’s Plain in South Africa, shared her experiences at St Emlyn’s Live. Kat discussed the challenges of working in a resource-limited environment, particularly in managing trauma and toxicology cases.

Her insights into managing trauma in a high-volume, low-resource setting were eye-opening. Kat also shared fascinating details about the use of high doses of atropine for poisoning cases, highlighting the unique medical practices required in such environments.

Kat’s presentation underscored the value of structured volunteer programs that integrate volunteers into local healthcare systems, providing both valuable learning experiences and much-needed support to local healthcare providers.

The Future of SMACC: CODA

March also marked the end of an era with the final SMACC conference in Sydney. SMACC has been a cornerstone for many in the emergency and critical care communities, offering unparalleled opportunities for learning and networking. However, the spirit of SMACC lives on in its successor, CODA.

CODA: A New Beginning

CODA aims to build on SMACC's successes while addressing broader health issues such as vaccination, climate change, and healthcare inequality. The goal is to leverage the engaged community SMACC created to drive meaningful change on a global scale.

CODA plans to tackle these global health issues by bringing together a diverse group of professionals, including those outside the traditional medical fields. This interdisciplinary approach aims to create innovative solutions to some of the world’s most pressing health challenges.

Looking Ahead

While we bid farewell to SMACC, we look forward to the new opportunities CODA will bring. Its emphasis on tackling significant health challenges aligns with the evolving needs of the global healthcare community, promising an exciting future.

What to Expect from CODA

CODA will continue the tradition of high-quality content and dynamic presentations that SMACC was known for. However, it will also incorporate new elements focused on global health advocacy and interdisciplinary collaboration. Expect to see more discussions on how healthcare professionals can contribute to solving broader societal issues.

Additional Highlights from March

Critical Appraisal Nuggets (CANS) on P-values

We also introduced a mini podcast series called Critical Appraisal Nuggets (CANS) focusing on p-values, featuring myself and Rick Body. P-values are a common topic in exams and critical appraisal, and understanding them is crucial for interpreting medical research.

This less-than-ten-minute podcast provides a concise overview of p-values, helping clinicians and students alike grasp this important concept. By demystifying p-values, we aim to enhance our audience's critical appraisal skills, enabling better evidence-based practice.

Dual Coding in Medical Education

Nick Smith, a recent addition to the St Emlyn's team and a brilliant clinical educator, shared insights on dual coding. Dual coding involves using both verbal and visual information to enhance learning and retention.

Nick’s post emphasized how our brains struggle to process multiple streams of information simultaneously. Effective teaching and communication require a balance between verbal explanations and visual aids, ensuring that learners can absorb and retain information without being overwhelmed.

The Impact of Reboa in Trauma Care

Zaf Qasim, a great friend of ours over in the US, examined the impact of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (Reboa) in trauma care. This post, based on a paper published in JAMA Surgery, analyzed Reboa success rates in civilian trauma using a US database.

The findings suggested that Reboa was associated with higher mortality rates compared to similar patients who did not receive Reboa. This raises important questions about patient selection and the overall benefits of Reboa in trauma care.

Zaf’s post highlighted the need for ongoing research and evidence to determine Reboa's true value. While there are compelling pathophysiological arguments for its use, the clinical outcomes must be scrutinized to ensure it is applied appropriately and effectively.

The Role of Evidence-Based Practice

At St Emlyn's, we prioritize evidence-based practice in all aspects of emergency medicine. The discussions around Reboa, p-values, and dual coding all reinforce the importance of using high-quality evidence to guide clinical decisions and educational strategies.

Final Thoughts

March 2019 was a month of incredible learning and growth. From managing complex ACHD patients to discussing the ethics of volunteering and exploring cutting-edge trauma research, we covered a wide range of topics that are crucial for emergency medicine professionals.

Stay Connected

As we move forward, we encourage you to stay connected with St Emlyn’s for more insights, updates, and discussions. Follow our blog, participate in our events, and join the conversation on social media. Together, we can continue to advance the field of emergency medicine and make a difference in the lives of our patients.

Thank you for joining us this month. Enjoy your practice, and we’ll be back with more great content in April. Have fun, stay safe, and keep learning!

Understanding P Values: A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians

Welcome to St Emlyn's blog, where we delve into the complex world of P values—a crucial element in medical research. For emergency medicine clinicians, understanding P values is essential for interpreting study results and applying them effectively in clinical practice. This post aims to demystify P values and enhance your critical appraisal skills.

What Are P Values?

P values are a measure of the probability that an observed difference could have occurred just by chance if the null hypothesis were true. The null hypothesis generally states that there is no difference between two treatments or interventions. Thus, a P value helps us determine whether the observed data is consistent with this hypothesis.

The Null Hypothesis and Significance Testing

To grasp P values fully, we start with the null hypothesis. In any trial, we begin with the premise that there is no difference between the treatments being tested. Our goal is to test this null hypothesis and ideally disprove it, a process known as significance testing.

When we calculate a P value, we express the probability of obtaining a result as extreme as the one observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. For instance, a P value of 0.05 suggests a 5% chance that the observed difference is due to random variation alone.

The Magic of 0.05

The threshold of 0.05 has become a benchmark in research. A P value below this threshold is often considered statistically significant, while one above is not. However, this binary approach oversimplifies statistical analysis. The figure 0.05 is arbitrary and does not imply that results just above or below this threshold are vastly different in terms of practical significance.

Clinical vs. Statistical Significance

Distinguishing between statistical significance and clinical significance is crucial. A statistically significant result with a very small P value may not always translate into clinical importance. For example, a large study might find that a new treatment reduces blood pressure by 0.5 millimetres of mercury with a P value of 0.001. While statistically significant, such a small reduction may not be clinically relevant.

Conversely, a clinically significant finding might not reach the strict threshold of statistical significance, particularly in smaller studies. Therefore, it's essential to consider both the magnitude of the effect and its practical implications in clinical practice.

The Fragility Index

The fragility index is an alternative measure that addresses some limitations of P values. It calculates the number of events that would need to change to alter the study's results from statistically significant to non-significant. This index provides insight into the robustness of the findings. Surprisingly, even large trials can have a low fragility index, indicating that their results hinge on a small number of events.

Moving Beyond 0.05

Recognizing the limitations of the 0.05 threshold, some researchers advocate for more stringent criteria, such as a P value of 0.02, particularly in large randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This approach aims to reduce the likelihood of false-positive results and improve the reliability of findings. However, it also raises the bar for demonstrating the efficacy of new treatments, which can be a double-edged sword.

Multiple Testing and Bonferroni Adjustment

A significant challenge in research is multiple testing. Conducting numerous statistical tests increases the probability of finding at least one significant result purely by chance. This issue is particularly relevant in exploratory studies where multiple outcomes are assessed.

One method to address this problem is the Bonferroni adjustment, which adjusts the significance threshold based on the number of tests performed. While this approach helps control the risk of false positives, it can be overly conservative and reduce the power to detect true effects. Therefore, it should be used judiciously.

Interim Analysis in Clinical Trials

Interim analysis is a crucial aspect of clinical trials, allowing researchers to assess the effectiveness or harm of an intervention before the study's completion. However, performing multiple interim analyses can increase the risk of false-positive findings. To mitigate this risk, researchers use techniques like P value spending functions, which adjust the significance threshold for each interim analysis.

Additionally, the number of interim analyses should be limited and pre-specified in the study protocol. This ensures that decisions to stop a trial early are based on robust evidence and not on arbitrary or opportunistic analyses.

Effect Size and Confidence Intervals

P values alone do not provide a complete picture of the study results. It's equally important to consider the effect size, which measures the magnitude of the difference between treatments. A small P value might indicate statistical significance, but without a substantial effect size, the clinical relevance of the finding remains questionable.

Confidence intervals (CIs) complement P values by providing a range within which the true effect size is likely to lie. A 95% CI means that if the study were repeated multiple times, 95% of the calculated intervals would contain the true effect size. CIs offer valuable context for interpreting P values and understanding the precision of the estimated effect.

Practical Tips for Interpreting P Values

1. Understand the Null Hypothesis: Always start with a clear understanding of the null hypothesis and what the study aims to test.
2. Look Beyond the P Value: Consider the effect size, confidence intervals, and clinical significance of the findings.
3. Be Cautious with Multiple Testing: Recognize the increased risk of false positives with multiple comparisons and apply appropriate adjustments.
4. Assess the Fragility Index: Use the fragility index to gauge the robustness of the study's findings.
5. Consider Interim Analysis: Ensure that interim analyses are pre-planned and interpreted with caution to avoid bias.
6. Question the Threshold: Remember that the 0.05 threshold is not a magic number. Interpret P values in the context of the study design, sample size, and practical implications.

Conclusion

P values are a fundamental aspect of medical research, but their interpretation requires a nuanced understanding. By considering the null hypothesis, clinical significance, effect size, and confidence intervals, we can make more informed decisions based on the data. As emergency medicine clinicians, our goal is to apply research findings judiciously to improve patient care.

We hope this deep dive into P values has clarified their role and limitations in research. Remember, the journey to mastering statistical concepts is ongoing, and continuous learning is key. If you have any questions or thoughts, please share them in the comments below. Happy appraising, and stay curious!

St. Emlyn's January Roundup: Key Insights and Innovations

Hello and welcome to the St. Emlyn’s Podcast. I’m Simon Carley, joined by Rick Body. Today, we’re bringing you our January roundup, sharing the most intriguing and impactful content we've covered this month. From reflecting on 2018 to exploring new guidelines and innovations in emergency medicine, we have a lot to discuss. Let’s dive in!

Reflecting on 2018: Transformational Reads and Achievements

As we started January, we reflected on 2018, a year filled with significant achievements and insights. One standout discussion was our review of key books that left a lasting impact. A personal favorite of mine is "Why We Sleep" by Matthew Walker. This book has been transformational for me, influencing how I live and advise others on health, well-being, and performance. The insights on sleep’s importance in education, creativity, and overall health are profound.

Rick, did anything from our 2018 review resonate with you?

Rick Body: Absolutely, Simon. The variety of books we discussed was impressive. It was enlightening to hear about others' achievements in 2018 and their goals for 2019. This exercise really focused my mind on what I hope to achieve this year.

Goals for 2019: Innovations and Personal Aspirations

As we moved from reflections to aspirations, we set our sights on exciting projects for 2019. One major highlight is the AI incubator for emergency care. This initiative aims to support academic careers and foster partnerships between data and industry to enhance medical technologies. It’s an exhilarating time for advancements in emergency care.

Rick is incredibly busy with groundbreaking work, particularly in diagnostics in Manchester. His research and speaking engagements are making waves in the medical community. For more details on these projects, check out the blog where all the information is comprehensively covered.

New Year’s Resolutions: Insights from Liz Crowe

We explored New Year’s resolutions with Liz Crowe, who offered a fresh perspective on well-being and resolutions. Instead of focusing on all-or-nothing goals, Liz suggests starting small and seeking rewards rather than punishments. This approach makes significant lifestyle changes more manageable and sustainable. Committing to resolutions publicly or with a friend can enhance accountability and success.

Rick, do you have any New Year’s resolutions?

Rick Body: It’s challenging to pinpoint one or two, but Liz’s advice on avoiding binary thinking is crucial. Recognizing progress rather than dwelling on setbacks can make a big difference.

Tetanus Guidelines: New Insights and Practical Applications

In January, we delved into updated tetanus guidelines, highlighting significant changes. Previously, a single booster in your early 20s was deemed sufficient, but the new guidelines recommend a 10-year booster. This change stems from the recognition that immunity wanes over time. Interestingly, point-of-care testing is now available to detect active tetanus immunization, allowing for more tailored booster decisions.

These updates are crucial for emergency physicians to ensure compliance with current standards and provide optimal patient care. The blog post simplifies these guidelines, making them accessible and easy to understand.

Excellence in Emergency Medicine: Claire Richmond’s Contributions

We featured Claire Richmond, a hero in the emergency medicine community. Claire, who works with Sydney HEMS, delivered an inspiring keynote at the St. Emlyn’s live conference. Her talk focused on excellence, performance, training, and development in retrieval medicine. She emphasized the importance of honesty, feedback, and continuous improvement.

For those aspiring to achieve self-actualization in emergency medicine, Claire’s insights are invaluable. We’ve shared the video and podcast of her talk, and we highly recommend checking them out.

Prognosticating Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: Dan Horner’s Research

Another highlight of January was Professor Dan Horner’s discussion on serum neurofilament light chains, a promising tool for prognosticating cardiac arrest outcomes. This research, stemming from the TTM trial, suggests that these biomarkers can provide early predictions about patient outcomes. Early identification of patients likely to have poor neurological outcomes can significantly impact family discussions, treatment decisions, and overall management.

This research is groundbreaking and holds potential for future clinical applications, although it’s not yet ready for immediate practice.

Celebrating Evidence-Based Medicine: Critical Appraisal E-Book

We’re incredibly proud of our journal club series at St. Emlyn’s, which advocates for evidence-based medicine. This series highlights the latest research, making it accessible and understandable. To celebrate the contributions over the past year, we’ve compiled an e-book available for free download. This resource is a testament to our commitment to advancing medical knowledge and practice.

Pre-Medication for Ketamine Sedation: Exploring New Research

One of the intriguing studies we covered this month examined pre-medication with midazolam or haloperidol for ketamine sedation. The randomized control trial suggested that pre-medication could reduce complications like abnormal behaviors and emergence phenomena. However, it also increased recovery time, requiring more resources and nursing time.

While the findings are interesting, they haven’t convinced us to change our current practice. However, it’s essential to stay informed about such research to make informed decisions in clinical practice.

HEMS and Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Evaluating Outcomes

We also discussed the role of HEMS in improving outcomes for traumatic cardiac arrest. The study from the UK highlighted the high-level interventions provided by HEMS teams. However, it raised questions about the overall impact on patient survival. Of the 263 patients attended, only seven survived, and all had achieved ROSC before HEMS arrival. This data suggests that while HEMS interventions are critical, their direct impact on survival needs further evaluation.

This topic is sure to spark debate, and we appreciate the transparency of HEMS services in sharing their data and encouraging open discussions.

Looking Ahead: Plans for the Future

As we wrap up January, we’re excited about the plans for the coming months. Simon is heading to Jeddah for a significant event, and we’re considering hosting another St. Emlyn’s live conference and teaching course. We’re exploring innovative formats for medical conferences and welcome your ideas on how we can make these events even more impactful.

Support St. Emlyn’s: Keeping Education Free and Accessible

Since 2012, we’ve funded the blog and podcast out of our own pockets, but as our audience has grown, so have the costs. If you find our content valuable, please consider making a small donation or subscribing for regular contributions. Your support helps us keep St. Emlyn’s free and accessible to all.

Thank you for your time and continued support. Stay tuned for more updates, and as always, enjoy your emergency medicine practice and take care!

In this episode of the St. Emlyn's podcast, Rick Body and Charlie Reynard discuss an influential research project conducted by Dr. Reynard during his academic foundation program. The paper, titled 'Optimizing Antiplatelet Utilization in the Acute Care Setting,' explores decision-making under clinical uncertainty, specifically in emergency medicine for suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Through systematic reviews and decision tree modeling, the research evaluates the benefits and risks of various antiplatelet therapies, such as Ticagrelor and aspirin versus Clopidogrel and aspirin. The findings reveal that Ticagrelor and aspirin are often more beneficial for patients with a greater than 8% probability of ACS, while Clopidogrel holds little to no place in current practice. The discussion opened up new questions about dynamic risk prediction and the importance of modeling to inform clinical decisions.

00:00 Introduction to the Podcast

00:26 Charlie's Research Background

00:52 Overview of the Research Paper

01:17 Decision Making Under Uncertainty

03:05 Systematic Reviews and Data Collection

03:46 Building the Decision Tree Model

04:48 Results and Key Findings

08:07 Implications for Clinical Practice

09:19 Future Directions and Conclusion

Salim Rezaie from the REBEL EM podcast takes us through the optimal management of cardiac arrest and also explores some of the controversies and difficulties that make the difference to our patients. 

You can read a lot more about the background to this talk, see the evidence and watch the video on the St Emlyn's site. Just follow this link. https://www.stemlynsblog.org/beyond-acls-salim-rezaie-at-stemlynslive/ 

Natalie and Simon discuss reflections, e-books and life at Sydney HEMS. This week we have added Lorikeets in the background (Nat recorded at Coogee Bay in NSW). We think they sound cute so we've kept them in (or rather we could not edit them out).

S

In this episode of the St Emlyn's podcast, Ian Beardsell and Simon Carley review the top 10 trauma papers of the year, highlighting key findings and their implications for trauma care. The selection includes significant studies published in high-profile journals such as The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine, offering valuable insights for healthcare professionals in emergency and trauma medicine.

1. Whole Body CT Scanning: REACT-2 Study

The REACT-2 study explored the impact of whole-body CT (WBCT) scanning on trauma patients, particularly its effect on mortality rates. The study involved 1400 patients and found no significant difference in mortality between those who received WBCT and those who underwent more selective CT scanning. The difference in radiation exposure was minimal, suggesting that WBCT's comprehensive imaging might be more beneficial than harmful, especially in elderly patients where missed injuries can complicate outcomes. This study reassures trauma team leaders that current scanning practices are appropriate and highlights the importance of a patient-centred approach based on clinical presentation.

2. Impact Brain Apnea (IBA)

Impact brain apnea, characterized by apnea and a catecholamine surge following a severe head blow, has been increasingly recognized in trauma care. The paper, co-authored by John Hines and Mark Wilson, provides a detailed explanation of IBA's pathophysiological mechanisms. This condition can lead to cardiac arrest if not promptly addressed, emphasizing the need for immediate intervention in cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Understanding IBA helps emergency care providers identify and treat potentially life-threatening conditions that may not be immediately apparent.

3. Decompressive Craniectomy for Raised ICP: RESCUE-ICP Trial

The RESCUE-ICP trial examined the outcomes of decompressive craniectomy in patients with refractory intracranial pressure (ICP) due to severe TBI. The study found that while the procedure increased survival rates, many survivors experienced significant disability. This raises ethical considerations about the quality of life post-intervention. The trial underscores the importance of informed consent and discussions about potential outcomes with patients' families, aligning treatment with patient values.

4. STITCH Trial: Surgery Timing for Intracranial Bleeds

The STITCH trial focused on the timing of surgical intervention in patients with traumatic intracranial bleeds. Although the trial faced recruitment challenges and was terminated early, results suggested better outcomes with early surgery. This finding, while not statistically conclusive, supports the notion that timely intervention can reduce mortality and improve recovery. Emergency physicians and neurosurgeons should consider these findings when deciding on surgical timing in TBI cases.

5. Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Epidemiology and Outcomes

Using data from the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN), this study examined traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) cases, revealing a 30-day survival rate of 7.5%. This rate, similar to medical cardiac arrests, challenges the perception that TCA is almost always fatal. The study highlights the importance of aggressive resuscitation efforts and underscores the need for ongoing training to retain skills in managing these rare but critical events.

6. Open vs. Closed Chest Compressions in TCA

The effectiveness of open chest (thoracotomy) versus closed chest compressions in TCA was explored, with findings indicating similar outcomes in terms of end-tidal CO2 levels, a marker for effective CPR. This challenges the notion that thoracotomy should always be performed in TCA cases. The study suggests that standard advanced life support (ALS) protocols may suffice in certain scenarios, especially where thoracotomy is not practical.

7. Rocuronium vs. Succinylcholine for RSI in Severe Brain Injury

The choice between rocuronium and succinylcholine for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in severe brain injury remains debated. An observational study found no significant overall difference in mortality between the two drugs, though succinylcholine was associated with higher mortality in severe head injury cases. This suggests a possible preference for rocuronium in such scenarios, though the evidence is not strong enough to mandate a change in practice.

8. Intraosseous Needle Length in Obese Patients

As obesity becomes more prevalent, appropriate intraosseous (IO) needle length is crucial for effective vascular access. The study recommended using longer yellow IO needles for patients with a BMI over 43, as standard blue needles may not reach the marrow. This is particularly important in emergency situations where IV access is difficult, ensuring proper drug administration and preventing complications like compartment syndrome.

9. Optimal Site for Needle Decompression in Tension Pneumothorax

A systematic review recommended the anterior axillary line as the preferred site for needle decompression in tension pneumothorax, aligning with standard chest drain placement. The review also noted significant complication rates associated with needle decompression, suggesting that alternative methods like thoracostomy may be necessary in certain cases. This finding emphasizes the need for precise technique and careful consideration in managing tension pneumothorax.

10. Weekend Effect in Major Trauma Care

The study examined the "weekend effect" in major trauma care, finding no significant difference in mortality between weekend and weekday admissions. This suggests that well-resourced, consultant-led trauma care can provide consistent outcomes regardless of the day. The findings advocate for the 24/7 availability of senior emergency physicians and trauma teams, ensuring high-quality care at all times.

Conclusion

This year's top trauma papers provide valuable insights into current practices and emerging trends in trauma care. While there may not have been groundbreaking changes, the studies reinforce the importance of evidence-based decision-making, ongoing training, and ethical considerations in patient management. As the field evolves, staying informed about the latest research is crucial for improving patient outcomes and delivering high-quality trauma care. For further details and access to the studies, visit the Sentemlin site and related FOAMed resources.

In a new podcast format Simon (@EMManchester) and Iain (@docib) discuss the month's offerings from the St Emlyn's blog and podcast (www.stemlynsblog.org).

It's been a month full of interesting posts on subjects as diverse as Thrombolysis in Stroke (Alan Grayson), The Future of Emergency Medicine in the Social Age (Simon), Cardiac Arrest Centres (Simon), Love in Critical Care (Liz Crowe), Transfers (Nat and Simon), Thrombolysis in PE (a guest post from FOAMed legend Anand Swarminathan) and Benzos in Back Pain (Janos). Head to the website for the articles themselves and all the references and links you need.

We're aiminig to make this a regular monthly podcast - let us know if it's useful and enjoyable and how we could make it even more educational.

Understanding Blinding in Clinical Trials: A Comprehensive Guide

Blinding, also referred to as masking, is a crucial methodological approach used in clinical trials to eliminate bias and ensure the validity of study outcomes. This practice involves keeping study participants, clinicians, and researchers unaware of the treatment assignments. The goal is to prevent the knowledge of treatment allocation from influencing behaviors, perceptions, or evaluations, thus maintaining the integrity of the research.

Types of Blinding in Clinical Trials

Single Blinding: In this approach, only the participants are unaware of the treatment they receive. For example, in a drug trial comparing an anticoagulant to a placebo, participants do not know which they are receiving. This method helps prevent the placebo effect or other biases arising from participants' expectations. Ensuring effective single blinding requires that the placebo and active treatment appear identical in all sensory aspects, including appearance, taste, and even side effects.

Double Blinding: This method extends the concealment to both participants and the clinicians or researchers administering the treatment. It is crucial because knowledge of the treatment can influence the clinical management of the patient or the interpretation of symptoms. For example, if a doctor knows a patient is receiving a placebo, they might provide less attentive care. Double blinding helps ensure that all patients receive consistent care, and it prevents clinicians from unintentionally influencing the outcomes based on their expectations.

Triple Blinding: The most comprehensive form of blinding, triple blinding, includes blinding the data analysts as well. This method prevents bias during the interpretation of study results, as analysts are unaware of which group received the treatment. This approach is particularly important when the data analysis involves subjective judgments or when the analysis plan is not strictly predefined. Triple blinding helps ensure that data is handled objectively, leading to more reliable conclusions.

Importance of Blinding in Clinical Trials

Blinding is essential to minimize various forms of bias that can compromise the validity of clinical trials. These biases include:

1. Participant Bias: When participants know the treatment they are receiving, it can influence their reporting of symptoms and outcomes, skewing the study results.

2. Observer Bias: Clinicians and researchers may consciously or unconsciously alter their assessments based on their knowledge of the treatment allocation. This can affect how symptoms are recorded or how interventions are implemented, potentially leading to biased outcomes.

3. Analyst Bias: Data analysts may be influenced by their expectations or hypotheses if they know which treatment group participants belong to. This can affect the objectivity of the data analysis, making the results less reliable.

Practical Challenges in Blinding

Despite its importance, blinding is not always feasible or ethical in all types of studies. For example, in trials comparing physical interventions like a wrist splint versus a plaster cast, it is impossible to blind participants or clinicians due to the visible nature of the treatments. In such cases, researchers must adopt a pragmatic approach, using rigorous randomization and transparent reporting to mitigate potential biases.

A notable case highlighting the challenges of blinding is a study conducted by Dan Horner and colleagues on the treatment of calf deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The study compared the use of warfarin with no anticoagulation. Ideally, the study would have included a placebo group, but ethical and practical concerns made this impossible. Patients on warfarin require regular monitoring and dose adjustments, which could not ethically be simulated for a placebo group. As a result, the study was conducted without blinding but still provided valuable insights into the treatment's potential benefits.

Sham Interventions in Blinding

In some studies, particularly those involving surgical procedures, sham interventions are used to maintain blinding. This involves performing procedures on the control group that mimic the intervention without providing therapeutic benefits. For instance, in trials assessing surgical techniques, control group participants might undergo anesthesia and incision without actual surgery. This method is ethically sensitive but can be crucial in preventing bias from influencing the study's outcomes.

Blinding in Diagnostic Studies

Blinding is also vital in diagnostic studies, where it ensures that the assessment of diagnostic tests is not influenced by pre-existing knowledge about the patients. For instance, in evaluating a new diagnostic test like a D-dimer test for pulmonary embolism, blinding the interpreters of test results is essential. It prevents bias in the interpretation of test outcomes, ensuring that results are evaluated based on the test's performance rather than expectations or assumptions.

Conclusion

Blinding is a fundamental component of clinical trial design, crucial for minimizing bias and ensuring the validity of study findings. Whether it is single, double, or triple blinding, the technique helps maintain objectivity in clinical research, making the results more reliable and trustworthy. While blinding is not always possible, especially in trials involving visible interventions, researchers must strive to minimize bias through careful study design and transparent reporting.

As readers and critical appraisers of clinical research, it is essential to look for evidence of blinding and consider its impact on the validity of study results. Understanding the importance and challenges of blinding can help us better interpret clinical trial outcomes and make informed decisions in healthcare.

Thank you for joining us at St. Emlyn's. Stay curious, critically appraise the evidence, and continue exploring the fascinating world of clinical trials. Until next time, stay informed and engaged in advancing medical knowledge.

Understanding Randomization in Clinical Trials: A Guide for Critical Appraisal

Welcome to the St. Emlyn's blog, your go-to resource for insights into emergency medicine and critical care. Today, we're diving into a crucial aspect of clinical research: randomization. Whether you're preparing for exams like the FR-KEM or just want to deepen your understanding of clinical trials, understanding randomization is key to critical appraisal. This blog post will walk you through the essentials, common pitfalls, and best practices for ensuring robust study design.

What is Randomization?

Randomization is a foundational process in clinical trials, particularly those evaluating interventions. It refers to the random allocation of participants into different treatment groups. This process aims to eliminate selection bias and ensure that differences in outcomes can be attributed to the intervention itself rather than other factors.

Why is Randomization Important?
Randomization is crucial because it helps establish causality. Without it, studies might only reveal associations rather than true cause-and-effect relationships. For example, if we observe patients receiving different treatments in a non-randomized manner, systematic differences between the groups—such as varying standards of care—could confound the results. Randomization seeks to balance these factors, allowing for a clearer interpretation of the intervention's effectiveness.

Key Components of Randomization

1. Random Allocation: This is the process of assigning participants to treatment groups purely by chance. It can be done using random number tables, computer-generated sequences, or other methods that ensure allocation is not influenced by investigators or participants.

2. Allocation Concealment: This involves hiding the allocation sequence from those involved in enrolling participants. It's vital to prevent selection bias, where researchers might consciously or unconsciously influence the assignment of participants to specific groups.

3. Blinding: While not a part of randomization per se, blinding is closely related. It refers to keeping participants, healthcare providers, and researchers unaware of which treatment group participants are in. This prevents performance and detection biases.

Common Pitfalls in Randomization

Despite its importance, randomization can be implemented poorly, leading to biased results. Here are some common pitfalls:

• Inadequate Randomization Methods: Methods like assigning treatments based on birth dates or day of the week might seem random but can introduce systematic biases. For instance, there could be differences in care based on the day or time, making these methods unreliable.

• Failure to Conceal Allocation: In the past, brown envelope methods were used, where the treatment assignment was sealed in an envelope. However, this method is vulnerable to tampering. For instance, researchers might be tempted to "peek" at the assignment and selectively enroll participants, compromising the study's integrity.

• Small Sample Sizes: Small trials are particularly vulnerable to imbalance in baseline characteristics between groups purely by chance. This can lead to skewed results that do not accurately reflect the intervention's efficacy.

Best Practices in Randomization

To ensure robust and reliable results, certain best practices should be followed:

1. Use of Reliable Randomization Methods: In modern trials, computer-generated random numbers are the gold standard. They provide true randomness and can be tailored to the specific needs of the study.

2. Allocation Concealment Techniques: More sophisticated methods like centralized randomization, where a third party manages the allocation process, can help maintain concealment. In some studies, web-based or voice-based systems are used, which provide real-time allocation while preventing researchers from manipulating the process.

3. Stratification and Block Randomization: To address the issue of unequal distribution of participants' characteristics, stratification and block randomization are employed. Stratification involves grouping participants based on certain characteristics (e.g., disease severity) and ensuring even distribution across treatment groups. Block randomization, on the other hand, ensures that each treatment group has an equal number of participants within defined blocks, maintaining balance throughout the study.

The Role of Randomization in Analyzing Results

When analyzing the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the first step is to examine the baseline characteristics of the treatment groups. This is often presented in Table 1 of a study. The purpose is to ensure that randomization has successfully created comparable groups. If significant differences exist, they could confound the results, making it harder to attribute outcomes to the intervention alone.

Another critical aspect is to consider the size of the trial. Larger studies are generally better at balancing characteristics between groups, reducing the likelihood of chance imbalances. However, even in well-randomized studies, it's possible for imbalances to occur, especially in smaller trials. Researchers must acknowledge these potential imbalances and adjust their analyses accordingly.

Practical Considerations in Emergency Medicine

In emergency medicine, the need for rapid, reliable randomization methods is particularly pressing. Web-based randomization systems offer a convenient solution, providing quick, secure, and tamper-proof allocation. Similarly, voice-based systems, where a computer assigns treatment groups via a phone call, are another practical option.

For those conducting smaller trials, there are accessible tools available, such as Sealed Envelope (sealedenvelope.com), which offers randomization services tailored to smaller studies. These tools help maintain the integrity of the randomization process, even in resource-limited settings.

Special Considerations: Trials with Diverse Populations

In clinical trials, particularly in emergency settings, researchers often encounter a wide range of patient severities. For instance, in head injury studies, patients can vary significantly in their Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores. In such cases, simple randomization may inadvertently group all severe cases into one treatment arm, skewing the results.

To mitigate this, researchers use stratification, ensuring that key subgroups (e.g., GCS < 8) are evenly represented across treatment groups. This not only improves the internal validity of the study but also enhances the power of the statistical analyses, providing more reliable results.

Advanced Randomization Techniques

As trials become more complex, so do the randomization techniques. Block randomization is one such method that ensures each treatment group receives participants throughout the study, rather than in uneven waves. For example, rather than having all participants receive treatment A first, followed by treatment B, block randomization allocates treatments in smaller blocks (e.g., groups of 20), maintaining balance throughout.

This method is particularly valuable in trials with interim analyses or those that may stop early due to significant findings. It ensures that at any given point, the distribution of participants is roughly equal, allowing for fair and accurate assessment of the treatment effects.

Conclusion: The Importance of Rigorous Randomization

Randomization is the cornerstone of robust clinical trial design. It minimizes biases, balances baseline characteristics, and supports the validity of causal inferences. However, the process must be meticulously planned and executed. From choosing the right method to ensuring allocation concealment, every step is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the study.

For clinicians and researchers, understanding the nuances of randomization helps in critically appraising literature and designing their own studies. Whether you're preparing for an exam or conducting a trial, appreciating the intricacies of randomization will enhance your ability to interpret and apply clinical research findings effectively.

At St. Emlyn's, we emphasize the importance of thorough critical appraisal skills. By mastering these concepts, you'll be better equipped to discern high-quality evidence and make informed decisions in your clinical practice. Stay tuned for more insights and practical tips on navigating the world of clinical research.

Rick Body and Kerstin de Wit discuss the role of NOACs in clinical management. Part 1 addresses the basics, stuff you should know if you are prescribing these drugs.

Part 1 tells us the good stuff, don't forget to listen to 2 and 3 in the next few weeks as not everything is perfect ;-)

Check out the BLOG POST HERE
vb

R

Year in Review: Highlights in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care

As we close out the year, St Emlyn's takes a moment to reflect on the significant events and advancements in the field of emergency medicine, critical care, and FOAMed (Free Open Access Medical Education). The past year has seen remarkable progress in research, education, and community engagement, with key studies reshaping our understanding and practices. Here's a look back at the highlights and what we can look forward to in the coming year.

Key Research and Trials

This year has been notable for the publication of several high-impact studies in emergency medicine and critical care. While some findings may have appeared negative at first glance, they have ultimately underscored the strengths of current practices. For example, trials on mechanical CPR devices, such as the Lucas device, showed no significant improvement in outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Similarly, research on starch solutions in sepsis concluded that these substances could be harmful, advocating for their discontinuation despite continued use in some clinical settings.

The ARISE and ProCESS trials were particularly influential, examining the effectiveness of early goal-directed therapy in sepsis management. Although these studies did not demonstrate a significant advantage over standard care, they highlighted the high quality of usual treatment protocols, which have improved considerably over the past decade. The ANZICS trial also reported a significant decrease in sepsis mortality, further emphasizing the advancements in patient care.

Additionally, the Targeted Temperature Management trial found no difference in outcomes between maintaining post-cardiac arrest patients at 33°C versus 36°C. This finding suggests that more aggressive temperature control may not be necessary, streamlining care protocols.

The Role of FOAMed

The FOAMed movement has revolutionized access to medical education, allowing healthcare professionals to stay updated with the latest research and discussions. Within hours of publication, new studies are analyzed and debated on various platforms, enhancing knowledge dissemination and critical appraisal.

St Emlyn's, along with other prominent FOAMed resources like Life in the Fast Lane, has played a crucial role in this educational revolution. The emergence of new platforms, such as The Bottom Line, has provided additional avenues for high-quality content. The Bottom Line, in particular, offers concise, critical appraisals of literature from a British perspective, catering to a broad audience interested in emergency medicine and critical care.

Noteworthy Blogs and Podcasts

The past year has seen an increase in the quality and quantity of blogs and podcasts in the FOAMed community. Established sites like Resus.Me, EM Lyceum, and the SGM continue to provide valuable insights, while newer entries such as Broom Docs have brought fresh perspectives. Broom Docs, led by Casey Parker, is particularly noted for its thoughtful discussions on diagnostic tests and clinical judgment.

Podcasts have also become an essential part of the FOAMed landscape. St Emlyn's own podcast has grown significantly, offering interviews with experts and discussions on a wide range of topics. Other notable podcasts include Foamcast, which presents a polished and well-structured approach to emergency medicine education, and the Rage podcast, known for its informal yet informative style.

Conferences and the Evolution of Medical Education

Conferences remain a cornerstone of professional development in emergency medicine and critical care. This year, St Emlyn's team members attended several notable conferences, including the EMS Gathering in Ireland, which featured innovative learning approaches like the "Puss Bus" for sepsis education and Pecha Kucha-style presentations. These events provided valuable opportunities for networking, knowledge exchange, and exploring new educational formats.

A significant trend in conferences is the shift towards "Medutainment," which blends medical education with entertainment. This approach, inspired by platforms like TED Talks, emphasizes engaging and visually appealing presentations over traditional lecture formats. The move towards more dynamic and interactive sessions reflects the growing demand for high-quality, engaging content in medical education.

Looking Forward to 2015

The upcoming year promises to be equally exciting for emergency medicine and critical care. The SMACC Chicago conference in June is highly anticipated, featuring a lineup of world-class speakers and sessions. Additionally, the College of Emergency Medicine's conference in Manchester is expected to be a major event, with an impressive list of speakers and topics.

At St Emlyn's, we plan to continue expanding our content offerings. Our goal is to provide comprehensive coverage of key presenting complaints in the College of Emergency Medicine curriculum through our blog and podcast. We aim to deliver high-quality educational resources that not only inform but also inspire and engage our audience.

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our heartfelt thanks to everyone who has supported St Emlyn's and the broader FOAMed community. Special thanks go to Mike Cadogan, whose behind-the-scenes work has been instrumental in maintaining many FOAMed platforms. We also appreciate the contributions of our guest writers and the entire Life in the Fast Lane team for their invaluable support.

Conclusion

The past year has been marked by significant advancements and enriching experiences in emergency medicine and critical care. The growth of FOAMed has democratized access to knowledge, allowing healthcare professionals to stay current with the latest research and best practices. As we look forward to 2015, we are excited about the opportunities for further growth and learning. We remain committed to providing high-quality, accessible education and fostering a supportive, informed community.

We wish all our readers and listeners a happy and healthy holiday season. Whether you're spending time with family or working through the festive period, we hope you find joy and fulfillment in your work and life. Thank you for being part of our journey, and we look forward to another year of learning and growth together.

Rick and Iain explore how the latest guidance about the use of high sensitivity troponin was developed and how far we can be assured that it is evidence based.

The NICE guidance is available here. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/dg15

vb

S

Understanding Relative Risk, Absolute Risk, and Number Needed to Treat: A Guide for Emergency Medicine

Welcome back to the St. Emlyn’s podcast. I’m Iain Beardsell and joining me is Simon Carley. Today, we’re delving into the complex yet critical concepts of relative risk, absolute risk, and the number needed to treat (NNT) in the context of emergency medicine. These metrics are essential for understanding the effectiveness of treatments and making informed decisions in clinical practice.

The Importance of Understanding Risk Metrics

In emergency medicine, it’s vital to comprehend how different treatments impact patient outcomes. This understanding not only helps in communicating with patients but also aids in making better clinical decisions. Two key terms frequently encountered are relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction.

Relative Risk Reduction vs. Absolute Risk Reduction

Imagine we are conducting a trial on a new drug for myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. Typically, 10% of AMI patients die within a month. If our new treatment claims a 50% relative risk reduction, it sounds impressive. However, understanding what this actually means is crucial. A 50% relative risk reduction translates to reducing the death rate from 10% to 5%. While this is significant, it's essential to recognize the difference between relative and absolute risk reduction.

Calculating the Number Needed to Treat (NNT)

The NNT is a valuable metric for understanding how many patients need to receive a particular treatment to prevent one additional adverse outcome. It’s derived from the absolute risk reduction. For instance, if a treatment reduces mortality from 10% to 5%, the absolute risk reduction is 5%. To calculate the NNT, divide 100 by the absolute risk reduction percentage. In this case, 100 divided by 5 equals an NNT of 20. This means we need to treat 20 patients to save one life.

Examples of NNT in Practice

Let’s consider some real-world examples. Tranexamic acid in trauma has an NNT of around 50, meaning we need to treat 50 patients to save one life. For aspirin in treating myocardial infarction, the NNT is also around 50. These figures highlight the effectiveness of these treatments in clinical practice.

Balancing Benefits and Harms

Understanding NNT is crucial, but it’s equally important to consider the number needed to harm (NNH). This metric indicates how many patients need to receive a treatment before one adverse effect occurs. For example, in trials involving starch solutions for sepsis, the NNH was found to be around 10-16. This means for every 10 to 16 patients treated, one additional death occurred. Balancing the benefits and harms is essential for making informed clinical decisions.

Example: Stroke Thrombolysis

In stroke thrombolysis, the NNT is around 8, meaning one in eight patients benefits from the treatment. However, the NNH is about 16, indicating one in 16 patients might experience a harmful outcome, such as intracerebral hemorrhage. Communicating these risks and benefits to patients is crucial for informed consent and shared decision-making.

The Role of Natural Frequencies

Using natural frequencies, such as “one in 100 people” or “one in 50 people,” helps in explaining risks and benefits in a more understandable way. For instance, saying “one in 100 people in your neighborhood” or “one person in a packed football stadium” can make the statistics more relatable.

Misdiagnosis and Its Impact

A key takeaway is that not every missed diagnosis leads to adverse outcomes. Often, treatments may have minimal benefit, and in some cases, they could cause harm. For example, the rush to administer clopidogrel in acute myocardial infarction might not always be necessary, given its relatively high NNT.

Applying These Concepts in Clinical Practice

Understanding and applying these concepts can change how we approach patient care. It allows us to prioritize interventions that provide the most significant benefit while minimizing potential harm. It also highlights the importance of taking time to ensure the right diagnosis and treatment, rather than rushing into potentially harmful decisions.

The Number Needed to Educate (NNE)

A fun and thought-provoking concept introduced in our discussion is the Number Needed to Educate (NNE). How many blogs or articles do you need to read before it changes your clinical practice? This metric emphasizes the importance of continuous learning and staying updated with the latest evidence-based practices.

Conclusion

In emergency medicine, understanding relative risk, absolute risk, and NNT is vital for making informed treatment decisions. These metrics help in balancing the benefits and harms of treatments, leading to better patient outcomes. By effectively communicating these risks and benefits to patients, we can ensure shared decision-making and improve overall patient care.

Read more at St Emlyns and on the accompanying blogpost